Post by krcmdc on Jan 3, 2019 16:28:08 GMT
Since there is always some "debate" about which is better, I thought people might interested in the same debate, taken to the highest levels.
Charlie "Epiphany77" Carrell on the exploitative side, debating Chris "Apotheosis92" Kruk on the GTO side.
The video is titled as a "debate", so I keep referring to it as a "debate". But it's not really a debate, it's mostly just Charlie spewing nonsense while Chris debunks Charlie's nonsense. And whenever Charlie doesn't understand the refutation, he simply declares that they don't and won't agree and therefore concludes that things are "unprovable" or "inconclusive", etc etc...
Charlie "Epiphany77" Carrell on the exploitative side, debating Chris "Apotheosis92" Kruk on the GTO side.
The video is titled as a "debate", so I keep referring to it as a "debate". But it's not really a debate, it's mostly just Charlie spewing nonsense while Chris debunks Charlie's nonsense. And whenever Charlie doesn't understand the refutation, he simply declares that they don't and won't agree and therefore concludes that things are "unprovable" or "inconclusive", etc etc...
